Quantum 2-party cryptography differs from its classical
counterpart in at least one important way: Given blak-box access to a perfect
commitment scheme there exists a secure
quantum oblivious
transfer. This reduction proposed by Crépeau and Kilian was proved secure
against any receiver by Yao, in the case where perfect commitments are used.
However, quantum commitments would normally be based on computational
assumptions. A natural question therefore arises: What happens to the
security of the above reduction when computationally secure commitments are
used instead of perfect ones?
In this paper, we address the security
of
QOT when computationally binding string commitments are available.
In particular, we analyse the security of a primitive called Quantum
Measurement Commitment when it is constructed from unconditionally
concealing but computationally binding commitments. As measuring a quantum
state induces an irreversible collapse, we describe a QMC as an instance of
``computational collapse of a quantum state''. In a QMC a state appears to be
collapsed to a polynomial time observer who cannot extract full information
about the state without breaking a computational assumption.
We reduce
the security of QMC to a weak binding criteria for the string
commitment. We also show that secure QMCs implies QOT using a
straightforward variant of the reduction above